When it comes to profitably scaling a service provider business, there are two key requirements: First, delivering effective customer service that leads to more and more happy customers. Second, establishing the operational processes that enable this level of service, while boosting the efficiency and productivity of staff.
The service desk, more than just about any other platform or service, has a direct and fundamental role to play in both of these areas. A strong service desk can bring value to internal operations, and it can deliver differentiation in the market place. Therefore, it’s not overstating matters to say the service desk plays a very pivotal role in the MSP’s business performance and prospects.
Today, there are several approaches that you can take that will help your service desk support the growth of your business. Here, I’ll focus on one: providing customers with self-service access to the service desk.
Providing customers with direct access to information and processes in the service desk is one of the most beneficial things a service provider can do. This effort can both cut costs and improve customer service levels and satisfaction. That’s why instituting these capabilities should be job number one for any MSP that doesn’t already deliver them.
However, to date, a significant percentage of MSPs have not extended self-service to customers, even though a lot of service desk solutions deployed today support it. Why? Following are a few reasons:
- Mindset. In many service provider businesses, the service desk has been viewed solely as an internal tool, a mechanism that helps internal IT staff to do their jobs. This mindset has shaped tool purchase decisions and limited the effort service providers have put into the service desk—and as a result, their current capabilities are going to work against them.
- Limited knowledgebase. One of the key requirements of an effective self-service service desk is the knowledgebase. If service providers don’t have a robust, current knowledge base to leverage, the work involved in delivering self-service gets tougher.
- Tool limitations. Even though many tools may ostensibly offer self-service capabilities, the reality is that many are too cumbersome or limited to use effectively. In many cases, tools weren’t initially designed with self-service in mind, so these capabilities are limited or difficult to use. For example, many service desk platforms don’t offer a robust Web client interface.
Getting Started
For those organizations looking to deliver self-service capabilities, following are two examples of services that can be offered, and how delivering these services can help:
- Self help. Service desks can be the tool customers use to solve issues themselves. For example, if a user encounters a problem with a printer, they can go to a self-service portal, get quick access to relevant guidance in the knowledgebase, and take steps needed to solve the problem. This type of service has two significant benefits. First, customers will be delighted. In many cases, they can resolve an issue far faster than if they had to submit a ticket and wait for resolution. Thus, they are happier and more productive. Second, this service can directly and significantly reduce a service provider’s costs, which can feed directly into profits or more competitive pricing.
- Ticket submission. Service providers can equip users with a self-service portal through which they can log in and submit tickets themselves. By doing so, organizations can save a lot of money by reducing the number of calls coming into service desk personnel. For example, many estimates indicate organizations spend $12.00 to $20.00 per tier one service desk call. If a service provider has 1,000 calls coming into the service desk call center each month, and can realize even a 10% reduction, that reduction can yield savings of approximately $2,000 a month. In addition, when MSPs enable customers to check status online, users can see on a real-time basis what the status is, and what steps have been taken—whenever they want. Consequently, service organizations provide greater transparency, so users enjoy better visibility and grow more comfortable and satisfied with their service provider.
In both of the scenarios above, service providers enjoy reduced call volume, lower costs, and increased margins. What other tasks on your plate will provide more worthwhile outcomes?
Interested in discovering some other approaches that can help you turn your service desk into a profit multiplier? Be sure to sign up for the upcoming MSPmentor webcast, entitled “Building a Service Desk that Builds Business: 5 Tips to Success.”
Ken Vanderweel is marketing director, service providers, Nimsoft. Monthly guest blogs such as this one are part of MSPmentor’s annual platinum sponsorship. Read all of Nimsoft’s guest blogs here.
Read More About This Topic
Share This Post
Posted In: Guest Bloggers
Tags: help desk | Ken Vanderweel | Managed Services Webcast | MSPmentor Live | NimSoft | Service Desk
Interact: Add a Comment | Trackback Link | Permalink
Subscribe: RSS Feed


Take a look at our
I only agree with the ticket creation.
I would only put customer specific LOB applications / configurations into a knowledgebase like setting up a VPN or something.
If you create a general knowledgebase than there is an immense amount of time maintaining the information once your KB grows to the point where it’s effective for the customer to search there.
If the customer is inclined to self-service and perform a search for information related to their problem, they stand a much better chance of obtaining a current fix from Google then from an individual service providers KB.
Additionally, that’s one of the perks that they pay us a premium for; to be able to contact someone right away to help them with a question instead of futzing around with Google search results.
Harold Weiss
http://WeissTechSolutions.com
Harold, thanks for your thoughts! To keep the dialog going I’ve responded back on a couple of your points…
HaroldW: “If you create a general knowledgebase than there is an immense amount of time maintaining the information once your KB grows to the point where it’s effective for the customer to search there.”
KenV: True. However this is classic Pareto stuff. Do the most valuable info there and users will come back. Leave the other stuff to Google.
HaroldW: “Additionally, that’s one of the perks that they pay us a premium for; to be able to contact someone right away to help them with a question instead of futzing around with Google search results.”
KenV: Good point. However, I would argue that a) not all service providers focus on high touch (high cost) premium service b) even for those that do, an automated interface is still preferred by some users sometimes (particularly for Gen Y and Millenials)
Ken Vanderweel
Marketing Director, Service Providers
Nimsoft
Ken: Thanks for looping back with Harold.
Harold: Thanks for weighing in on the conversation. Please keep MSPmentor and its readership posted as you weigh more service desk and business moves. We’re always eager to hear from MSPs that are pursuing new models, initiatives, etc.
-jp