<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Office Communications Server: Reaching Critical Mass?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/</link>
	<description>Managed Services &#38; Cloud Services Blog for VARs &#38; MSPs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: william smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-53106</link>
		<dc:creator>william smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mspmentor.net/?p=7282#comment-53106</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is really quick to grasp of the need of the hosted model of unified communications. SAAS model still being not trusted enough hosted model provides the best alternative. Unified communication services will definitely gain pace  when all the big players like Microsoft and CIISCO  begin promoting them. But ultimately the end users are the major determinants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is really quick to grasp of the need of the hosted model of unified communications. SAAS model still being not trusted enough hosted model provides the best alternative. Unified communication services will definitely gain pace  when all the big players like Microsoft and CIISCO  begin promoting them. But ultimately the end users are the major determinants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-52957</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mspmentor.net/?p=7282#comment-52957</guid>
		<description>Rob: I think you&#039;re referring to &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.zagtech.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.zagtech.com&lt;/a&gt;. Correct? Do you work for them?
-jp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob: I think you&#8217;re referring to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.zagtech.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zagtech.com</a>. Correct? Do you work for them?<br />
-jp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-52956</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mspmentor.net/?p=7282#comment-52956</guid>
		<description>Always a big fan of Microsoft. ZAG has a free BPOS offering. Microsoft also just announced ShoreTel for IBM Lotus foundations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always a big fan of Microsoft. ZAG has a free BPOS offering. Microsoft also just announced ShoreTel for IBM Lotus foundations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-52929</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mspmentor.net/?p=7282#comment-52929</guid>
		<description>Matt: Thanks for raising some additional perspectives. I&#039;m familiar with the Intermedia-Unison effort. Our previous coverage mentioned Unison; sorry I didn&#039;t make that company clear in the blog post above. I&#039;ll continue to watch the Intermedia partner base closely as they evaluate UC strategies.
-jp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: Thanks for raising some additional perspectives. I&#8217;m familiar with the Intermedia-Unison effort. Our previous coverage mentioned Unison; sorry I didn&#8217;t make that company clear in the blog post above. I&#8217;ll continue to watch the Intermedia partner base closely as they evaluate UC strategies.<br />
-jp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt landis</title>
		<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2010/03/24/microsoft-office-communications-server-reaching-critical-mass/comment-page-1/#comment-52914</link>
		<dc:creator>matt landis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mspmentor.net/?p=7282#comment-52914</guid>
		<description>I have to agree to partners will need to take a look at OCS. We are a microsoft Gold partner that has been researching OCS hosted. I think this could be an interesting solution for smb.

But BPOS as a phone/complete UC system? ahem, not gonna happen...

#1-bpos offers NO telephones calls (no ent. voice)
#2-bpos can&#039;t even do peer-to-peer voice outside the firewall (i&#039;m serious: if 2 users are not inside the same firewall they can not do any voice/video/ (media) only IM!)
#3-BPOS OCS can&#039;t do any multiparty audio/video conference using ocs

Also please make it clear that Intermedia is not offering OCS Enterprise Voice as a UC solution--they are offering an unknown product called Unison, that has a lot of concerns in my mind other than just dialtone concerns. Concerns that other partners has echo&#039;d. One major one is that Unison/intermedia is asking parnters to ditch MS Outlook &amp; exchange--which sounds almost ridiculous to me.

Here is my research on Unison:
http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-about-unison.html

There are parnters offering full OCS Enterprise Voice:
http://gopronetworks.com/

Matt Landis
http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree to partners will need to take a look at OCS. We are a microsoft Gold partner that has been researching OCS hosted. I think this could be an interesting solution for smb.</p>
<p>But BPOS as a phone/complete UC system? ahem, not gonna happen&#8230;</p>
<p>#1-bpos offers NO telephones calls (no ent. voice)<br />
#2-bpos can&#8217;t even do peer-to-peer voice outside the firewall (i&#8217;m serious: if 2 users are not inside the same firewall they can not do any voice/video/ (media) only IM!)<br />
#3-BPOS OCS can&#8217;t do any multiparty audio/video conference using ocs</p>
<p>Also please make it clear that Intermedia is not offering OCS Enterprise Voice as a UC solution&#8211;they are offering an unknown product called Unison, that has a lot of concerns in my mind other than just dialtone concerns. Concerns that other partners has echo&#8217;d. One major one is that Unison/intermedia is asking parnters to ditch MS Outlook &amp; exchange&#8211;which sounds almost ridiculous to me.</p>
<p>Here is my research on Unison:<br />
<a href="http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-about-unison.html" rel="nofollow">http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-about-unison.html</a></p>
<p>There are parnters offering full OCS Enterprise Voice:<br />
<a href="http://gopronetworks.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gopronetworks.com/</a></p>
<p>Matt Landis<br />
<a href="http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://windowspbx.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810422.r22.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.mspmentor.net @ 2012-02-14 19:58:11 -->
