<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zmanda: Open Source Backup Meets Managed Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mspmentor.net/2009/03/20/zmanda-open-source-backup-meets-managed-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2009/03/20/zmanda-open-source-backup-meets-managed-services/</link>
	<description>Managed Services &#38; Cloud Services Blog for VARs &#38; MSPs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.mspmentor.net/2009/03/20/zmanda-open-source-backup-meets-managed-services/comment-page-1/#comment-46258</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mspmentor.net/2009/03/20/zmanda-open-source-backup-meets-managed-services/#comment-46258</guid>
		<description>I reader just emailed me, asserting this piece was far too positive on Zmanda. Yes, I&#039;m upbeat on Zmanda because the company has been disrupting traditional closed-source on-premise client/server solutions. 

But I do have to eat some crow: The article above should have at least mentioned the following: &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/kbcategory.jspa?categoryID=60&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon points to&lt;/a&gt; three companies -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://datacastlecorp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Datacastle&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperic.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hyperic&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ezasset.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EZasset&lt;/a&gt; -- as early, fully-functional storage and/or management solutions that successfully plugged into Amazon Web Services. 

In other words, Zmanda is sorting through some issues (such as SaaS billing as it pertains to VARs and MSPs) that other Amazon partners have already solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reader just emailed me, asserting this piece was far too positive on Zmanda. Yes, I&#8217;m upbeat on Zmanda because the company has been disrupting traditional closed-source on-premise client/server solutions. </p>
<p>But I do have to eat some crow: The article above should have at least mentioned the following: <a href="http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/kbcategory.jspa?categoryID=60" rel="nofollow">Amazon points to</a> three companies &#8212; <a href="http://datacastlecorp.com/" rel="nofollow">Datacastle</a>, <a href="http://www.hyperic.com" rel="nofollow">Hyperic</a> and <a href="http://www.ezasset.com" rel="nofollow">EZasset</a> &#8212; as early, fully-functional storage and/or management solutions that successfully plugged into Amazon Web Services. </p>
<p>In other words, Zmanda is sorting through some issues (such as SaaS billing as it pertains to VARs and MSPs) that other Amazon partners have already solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810422.r22.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.mspmentor.net @ 2012-02-14 15:07:33 -->
